The voltage source is 12V RMS 60Hz.

by HZSA
November 18, 2016 
Bit of a trick question, really, because incandescent lamps aren't resistors, they have baretter action and adjust their resistance to run at more or less constant temperature over a range of voltage inputs. There is no need for the capacitor, lamps do not need smooth dc, they are perfectly happy to run on full wave or half wave rectified ac. Use of a Schottky diode is overkill, any old 1N4000 series diode will do. The energy loss in the diode drops is negligible at this sort of voltage. In your circuits you will need 18V lamps. Without the capacitors you will need a 12V lamp for the full wave rectified circuit and a 6V lamp for the half wave rectified circuit. On 60Hz supply the half wave circuit may produce perceptible flicker and reduced lamp life. On 50Hz (as used in third world countries) the flicker will be more pronounced. 
ACCEPTED
+2 votes by mikerogerswsm November 21, 2016 
Great points! I interpreted it more as a homework question to "drive this load" rather than a lamp, but yeah incandescent lamps are full of their own weirdness. 
by mrobbins
November 21, 2016 
wow thanks  I didn't think about different lamp voltages too. 
by HZSA
November 21, 2016 
QUESTION 1 Your circuit #2 will be "more efficient" in terms of a smaller fraction of V1's power being "wasted" in the ACDC conversion. The reason is that in the bridge rectifier, there are always two diode drops in series with charging the capacitor. Can we quantify it? How much more efficient? I used your circuit and plotted P(V1), P(V2), P(BR1), P(D1), P(LAMP1), P(LAMP2), and did it from $t_1=\frac {1} {60}$ to $t_2=11 * \frac {1} {60}$. Then I summed over the time period (right click on graph, click "Show P(BR1) integral" etc. The totals I got (for 10 AC cycles) were: $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(V_1) dt = 1.785 J$$ $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(V_2) dt = 1.249 J$$ $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(BR_1) dt = 244.7 mJ$$ $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(D_1) dt = 60.55 mJ$$ $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(LAMP_1) dt = 1.513 J$$ $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(LAMP_2) dt = 1.157 J$$ Note that the powers of the sources are negative because power is flowing "out" of the elements, rather than into them. If we define the "efficiency" to be the energy delivered to the lamp divided by the energy delivered by the source, then: $$\eta_1 = \frac {\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(LAMP_1) dt} {\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(V_1) dt } = \frac {1.513 J} {1.785 J} = 0.848 = 84.8\%$$ $$\eta_2 = \frac {\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(LAMP_2) dt} {\int_{t_1}^{t_2} P(V_2) dt } = \frac {1.157 J} {1.249 J} = 0.926 = 92.6\%$$ So this confirms that circuit #2 is more efficient than circuit #1. Nice! QUESTION 2 Let's assume "brighter" just means "more power delivered to the lamp." In that case we just compare the two energy amounts calculated above, and it's clearly circuit #1. How much brighter? $$ \frac {1.513 J} {1.157 J} = 1.31$$ LAMP1 will be about 31% brighter than LAMP2. Very interesting question and engineering tradeoff! 
+1 vote by mrobbins November 20, 2016 
You must log in or create an account (free!) to answer a question.
Anyone can ask a question.
Did you already search (see above) to see if a similar question has already been answered? If you can't find the answer, you may ask a question.
CircuitLab's Q&A site is a FREE questions and answers forum for electronics and electrical engineering students, hobbyists, and professionals.
We encourage you to use our builtin schematic & simulation software to add more detail to your questions and answers.
Acceptable Questions:
Unacceptable Questions:
Please respect that there are both seasoned experts and total newbies here: please be nice, be constructive, and be specific!
CircuitLab is an inbrowser schematic capture and circuit simulation software tool to help you rapidly design and analyze analog and digital electronics systems.